19 Times Vote on Bill to Protect Babies Who Survive Abortion
Senate rejects "born-live" bill as anti-ballgame advocates reignite "late-term" abortion fence
The "Built-in-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Human action," a piece of legislation that echoed existing laws and medical practices, had niggling chance of passing in the Senate on Monday evening. And as predicted, information technology ultimately failed.
But its introduction and subsequent debate underscores something larger and more than substantial than the pecker itself: a push past the conservative right to reframe the reproductive rights fence toward third-trimester abortions.
In their comments leading upwards to Monday'southward determination on the legislation, Autonomous and Republican lawmakers painted starkly different pictures the beak. Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell chosen it a "straightforward" slice of legislation, while Sen. Tammy Duckworth, a Democrat from Illinois, chosen the beak a "political stunt."
The legislation -- which fell seven votes short of the 60 it needed to motility forward -- would take required doctors to provide care to infants who "survive an abortion or attempted abortion." A similar bill passed in 2002, but the most recent one was unlike in a key manner: It would have imposed fines and potential jail time for doctors who didn't provide intendance.
Abortion rights advocates rebuked the legislation and the rhetoric surrounding it, saying that the situation described in the bill -- infants surviving abortions -- is an farthermost rarity, only occurring in instances of abnormalities and then severe that the fetus has been deemed unviable. "When you're providing abortion care, this isn't something that happens," Elizabeth Nash, a senior state issues director at the Guttmacher Institute, said in a phone interview with CBS News Mon.
"This legislation is based on lies and a misinformation campaign, aimed at shaming women and criminalizing doctors for a practice that doesn't exist in medicine or reality," Planned Parenthood Federation of America President, Leana Wen, wrote in an email to CBS News.
Sen. Mazie Hirono from Hawaii chosen the beak "a solution in search of a problem."
Just six states are required to report data on so-called "born-alive" infants, according to a 2016 report from the Charlotte Lozier Institute, an anti-abortion inquiry group. In Florida, where data was bachelor, in that location were six instances in 2018, according to the state'south Agency for Health Care Assistants, the group responsible for distributing the state'due south Medicaid funds.
In an op-ed for the New York Times titled "I Didn't Impale My Baby," obstetrics and gynecologist Jen Gunter described her own feel delivering an infant that wasn't feasible and died shortly after birth. Twenty-two weeks into her pregnancy, Gunter'south water bankrupt and was told that 1 of her triplets, who the author named Aidan, had a less than one percent chance of surviving. "As Aidan'south parents we had decided that invasive procedures, like intravenous lines and a animate tube in a one-pound trunk, would be pointless medical care. And then, as we planned, Aidan died."
"I am uniquely positioned to say this bill is medically unnecessary and nothing more than a way to warp the reality of perinatal mortality (stillbirth or death inside the first week of life) to create confusion about abortion," Gunter wrote.
However, Republicans posed scenarios to contend for the bill'south passage during Monday'due south Senate debate. Sen. Ben Sasse, the sponsor of the neb, asked his colleagues to "movie a infant that'due south already been born, that's outside the womb, that'south gasping for air. That's the simply thing that this beak is well-nigh."
Democrats pointed out that doctors are already required by federal constabulary to provide care to infants built-in alive after an attempted ballgame. "It is, and always has been, a crime non to," Hirono said Monday.
Democratic Senators Doug Jones of Alabama, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Joe Manchin of Due west Virginia joined Republicans in voting to move the bill frontwards.
The push for the legislation is part of an ongoing attempt by Republicans to shift the debate on reproductive rights to focus on so-called late-term abortions, an expanse of the abortion debate that's more controversial than others. Although 60 percent of Americans believe abortion should exist generally legal in the beginning three months of pregnancy, just 13 percent say the process should be generally legal in the third trimester, according to a Gallup poll from May 2018.
That shift in rhetoric was evident during Monday'southward fence. Nearly every Republican senator who argued in the nib'due south favor mentioned Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam'southward comments on very tardily-term abortion, invoking his remarks to imply the embattled Democrat supports infanticide. President Trump too used the rhetoric, falsely saying in a tweet Monday, "The Democrat position on abortion is now so farthermost that they don't mind executing babies Later birth...."
Per the landmark 1973 Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court ruling, states may prohibit abortions after a fetus is determined to be feasible, or can survive outside of the womb. In certain states, women whose pregnancies have become unviable or jeopardize their own health accept legal access to an abortion in the tertiary trimester. But just over one per centum of abortions that occurred in 2015, the nigh recent year for which data is available, were after the patient'southward 21st calendar week of pregnancy, according to the Centers for Illness Control and Prevention.
Despite the rarity, rhetoric surrounding tertiary-trimester abortions reignited later New York passed legislation in January protecting abortions late in pregnancy when a woman'southward wellness is endangered. Debate intensified afterward last calendar month when Virginia lawmakers proposed a similar bill and embattled Governor Northam commented on it.
"Every bit soon as the ink was dry out on the New York abortion protections nosotros started to see bourgeois policymakers heighten problems around abortion later in pregnancy, and those attacks were heightened in the aftermath of the Virginia bill," Nash said. "These attacks, while aimed at ballgame afterward in pregnancy, exercise double-duty considering they as well demonize abortion providers also as the patients, which makes it easier to laissez passer total or near total abortion bans. That is their real goal: to ban abortion outright."
Thank you for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in
for more features.
tomasinimided1986.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/born-alive-act-senate-rejects-born-alive-bill-anti-abortion-advocates-reignite-late-term-abortion-debate-2019-02-27/
0 Response to "19 Times Vote on Bill to Protect Babies Who Survive Abortion"
Post a Comment